Warning. The information contained on this web site and the "star" system should only be used to illustrate that there are important issues and that there is tremendous variability between programs. No rating should be used to pick a program but rather should encourage visitors to obtain qualified professional consultation.

This web site was created because there is need for it. This research project is technically a “Formative Evaluation for a Rating System” with the purpose of locating data points that are significant. The project is not indefinite. One goal is to eliminate the need for this site by ultimately providing programs and industry trade organizations with useful information. Collaborations with programs, professional and consumer groups are invited.

This web site allows consumers, professionals and programs to co-create relevant information that reflects consumer and professional experiences with programs. The site promotes the need to bridge the gaps between programs, professionals and parents.

This web site was also created because there is little professional and consumer protection information available. The web site is contacted by parents, attorneys, media and health care professionals. The web site is intended to serve the needs of the many and not just needs of a few. The web site is not funded by programs.

This web site also exists because parents in some states have no voice except to file a civil suit, or they must merely hope that authorities will press criminal charges. Not every parent can afford to bring civil claims.  “Free market” pressures are not adequate to address emergent needs. Federal regulations are virtually non-existent and state licensure is not universal. There are programs that start in states where the operation cost is less because there is a lack of regulation. In fact, the US Embassy publishes concerns and warnings specific to programs that operate outside of the United States. Establishing programs outside the United States has many advantages including low costs, minimal regulation and near total insulation from liability.

The rating system is not a fixed algorithm. It is a formative evaluation research project that seeks collaboration and oversight. The ratings appear to have content, concurrent and construct validity. There are disclaimers as to the predictive value of these ratings and there are recommendations that parents always seek qualified consultation. The rating should raise concerns but are not sufficient to rule out a program. Programs with low ratings can and do help children. Research programs carefully and seek consultation.

There are 2 major sources to find consultants nationally.

www.StrugglingTeens.Com

www.EducationalConsulting.Org